Hello to MotorCarTube and a new video. Today we compare the Skoda Octavia Combi 2020 vs. Skoda Superb Combi 2020. Please let us know what you think. Which on That’s less than the enormous cavern of Skoda’s Superb iV Estate, but more than a BMW 330e Touring can manage, and Peugeot has retained a flat floor for the hybrid, which has no less boot space than the petrol or diesel 508 SW. It’s configurable, too, thanks to 60:40 split-folding rear seats and a load-through ski hatch. Cena. Na Autohledu porovnáváme Škoda Superb Combi 1,5 TSI ACT AP 2019 vs Škoda Superb Combi Scout 2,0 TDI DSG 4x4 2019 včetně všech parametrů, motorizací a ceny. Porovnejte auta na jednom místě! Face à face technique entre : Peugeot 508 SW GT BlueHDi 180 EAT8 et Skoda Superb Combi 1.4 TSI PHEV 218. Qui va remporter le comparateur automobile ? Les réponses sont ici ! Face à face technique entre : Peugeot 508 1.6 THP 165 et Skoda Superb Combi 1.4 TSI PHEV 218. Qui va remporter le comparateur automobile ? Les réponses sont ici ! El Skoda Octavia Combi de la prueba monta, en concreto, el acabado Sport y el conocido bloque 2.0 TDI de 150 CV asociado a un cambio automático de doble embrague DSG. Las principales virtudes de este modelo son el enorme maletero (640 litros), el confort de marcha y el bajo consumo de combustible, que circulando por carretera se queda fácil por debajo de los 5l/100 km. . HOME page / compare / Škoda Superb Combi TDI vs Peugeot 508 SW BlueHDi 180 Compare two cars 2019. - E - Luxury car wagon, 5 door front Badges Production Vehicle class Body style Wheel drive Safety 2018. - D - Large family car wagon, 5 door front Dimensons & Outlines Length Width Height Boot (min) Boot (max) Fuel tank 2019 Škoda Superb Combi 2018 Peugeot 508 SW © GAMA1 Solutions. Copying & distribution prohibited. Engine Diesel 4 - Inline, 4 valves per cylinder Turbo Engine Fuel Configuration Aspiration Displacement Power Torque Diesel 4 - Inline, 4 valves per cylinder Turbo Performance (manual gearbox) Gearbox type Vehicle weight Acc. 0-100 Top speed Cons. (urban) Cons. (highway) Cons. (average) CO2 emissions Performance (automatic gearbox) Gearbox type Vehicle weight Acc. 0-100 Top speed Cons. (urban) Cons. (highway) Cons. (average) CO2 emissions Expenses Virtual Adviser's™ opinion Overview We are here considering two somewhat similar cars, but we can't deny some of the obvious differences. For a start, they are not even classified under the same segment, with the Škoda being a luxury car and the Peugeot representing large family car vehicle class. The first one has a Volkswagen-engineered powertrain under the hood, a 4-cylinder, 16-valves 190hp unit, while the other one gets its power and torque from a 4-cylinder, 16-valves 178hp engine designed by Peugeot. Safety A starting point here would be to take a look at the results from European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP) tests which were performed on both of the cars, with the same number of safety stars gained in the process. That aside, let's consider some other aspects which affect safety. The first vehicle is a luxury car and that gives it a marginal advantage over the large family car competitor, at least that's what statistics show. On the other hand, when it comes to weight, a factor that most people underestimate, the French car offers a marginal difference of 1% more metal. Reliability I don't like generalizing things when it comes to reliability, although it does seem that both brands display similar results in faults and breakdowns, all the models observed together. That's the official data, while our visitors describe reliability of Škoda, as well as Peugeot, with the same average rating of out of 5. Unfortunatelly, I don't have enough insight that would allow me to comment in more details on the specific models level. We should definitely mention that owners of cars with the same powertrain as the Czech car rank it on average as while the one under the competitor's bonnet gets out of 5. Performance & Fuel economy Both of the cars accelerate exactly the same, so we couldn't put one above the other. Car No. 2 is faster though, reaching top speed of 231 kilometers per hour, 1km/h more than the other car. When it comes to fuel economy things look pretty much the same for both cars, averaging around liters of fuel per 100 kilometers (62 mpg), in combined cycle. Verdict Peugeot appears just a bit more reliable, although the difference is truly marginal. The most important thing when deciding between any two vehicles should always be safety, both passive and active. In this case though, it seems that both cars show similar levels of passenger protection all together, so that won't break a tie. When it comes to performance, both vehicles provide similar experience, so I wouldn't point any of them out. the Czech car still consumps less fuel, which needs to be taken into consideration. It's really tough to make a final decision here, but if I'd need to, I'd say Škoda. In any case that's my personal view, built upon all the data available to me. What should decide here though is the way you feel about the two vehicles, and I hope you'll find my guidelines useful in the process. Also, you could use the oportunity to find out which car, everything taken into account, would be the perfect choice for you in the eyes of the virtual adviser™, out of vehicles we currently have in our database. Check a car by its VIN number

peugeot 508 sw vs skoda superb combi